Brad Danks | CEO, OUTtv Media Global
Part 5 of 7 – CARTT Series: Beyond the Walled Garden
Read – Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7
By now, the pattern is clear. Canada’s media problem isn’t a shortage of creativity or public investment. The real issue is a system that rewards activity instead of learning, production instead of ownership, and stability over adaptation. The result? A steady stream of cultural moments that never add up to lasting advantage.
What’s often overlooked is that the future of Canadian media is already being built at the system’s edges.
In specialized genres, identity-based services, and export-focused companies, Canadian media firms are quietly building audiences, testing new ways to distribute, and holding onto their IP. They do this not because the system encourages it, but because working outside the protected centre demands it. Survival depends on ownership, connecting with audiences, and learning fast – not just following rules.
The future is being built at the edges. The real policy question is: do we treat that as an anomaly, or as the signal we should follow? The system treats edge success as exception. Policy should treat it as proof.
What Edge Players Have in Common
Companies like Blue Ant Media, Stingray, WildBrain, GustoTV, and APTN – along with OUTtv – demonstrate how this approach works. They focus on formats, libraries, and repeatable systems, not just one-off projects. They expand across platforms and countries, using each as a distribution surface, not a “home.” Audience data drives their decisions and rapid adaptation. IP is viewed as a compounding asset, and distribution is treated as a strategic priority, not an afterthought. And they export Canadian content globally in ways that are sustainable and self-reinforcing – precisely the outcome the Broadcasting Act envisioned.
In short, they act like micro-multinationals: global competitors building durable businesses across markets. Not just suppliers to a shrinking domestic system.
Wind Sun Sky Entertainment takes a different approach from the same starting point, building original IP across broadcast, YouTube, and gaming simultaneously, rather than originating in one platform and extending to others. WSS is not alone. Smaller studios and creator-led companies operating at this intersection are emerging across the country, largely outside the funding architecture entirely.
What these companies share is not just a different strategy, it’s a different relationship with the system. Most built what they built without structural support, and some built it despite active friction. That’s not a story about exceptional talent. It’s a story about a system that systematically underinvests in the behaviours it most needs to encourage – and often cannot see the value being built. When the companies doing the right things are the ones largely outside the funding architecture, the architecture has a design problem, not an edge problem.
There is a further problem. The layer where AI is moving fastest – distribution, discovery, metadata, recommendation – is also the layer Canadian policy institutions can see least, because Canada is barely in the distribution business. The system is being asked to redesign for a layer it does not observe.
This difference matters for policy. It reveals where the current system falls short. Canada’s media rules were built for centralized institutions: national broadcasters, major distributors, and vertically integrated companies. Today, this setup mostly channels resources to organizations built to manage decline, not to discover growth.
The Mirage of Centralization
Whenever the system is in transition, there’s a temptation to build something big and central – a national platform, a single champion, a one-size-fits-all solution that promises clarity and scale. These ideas look good on paper and sound great in politics. But they’re also fragile.
Centralized solutions pile on risk, slow down learning, and are often captured by the very incumbents who built the old system. A single national distributor would almost certainly funnel new public money to the biggest players – money that would get soaked up by structures built for a different era.
Federated systems are different. When many independent players experiment within shared rules and infrastructure, learning accelerates – and failures become lessons for all, not systemic setbacks. Canada already has a working model for this at the edges. The challenge isn’t starting from scratch, it’s to stop penalizing what’s already working.
What Real Redesign Requires
A redesigned system shouldn’t pick winners or dictate forms. Instead, it should change what makes sense for companies to do. IP retention, investment in distribution, and export performance should be just as logical and attractive as production compliance is right now.
That means real incentives to retain IP rights rather than sell them off to fill funding gaps. It means financial and operational support for the capabilities Canadian companies struggle to build right now – SVOD and FAST channel management, audience data, ad-tech, metadata, and platform partnerships. And it means measuring success by IP ownership rates, distribution capacity in Canadian hands, and export revenue – not just dollars spent or hours produced.
The federated model isn’t just theory. It works on a simple principle: participants compete on their own products, but cooperate on the infrastructure underneath. This provides the supports and capabilities no single player can build alone at competitive cost. Numeris, a not-for-profit industry-owned audience measurement organization, shows how this works for data. Broadcasters and marketers pool resources and oversee the system together, because shared measurement is more valuable than keeping it locked up as a private edge. Everyone TV shows the same logic applied to distribution: the UK’s main broadcasters jointly own the Freeview and Freely infrastructure that carries their content to UK audiences. That kind of model – shared infrastructure, distributed ownership, independent operation – is exactly what Canada’s media system needs for distribution, metadata, and export infrastructure. Building distribution capability on infrastructure Canadian companies do not own is itself a partial answer; the deeper hedge is the IP and audience relationships that travel across whichever platform layer prevails next.
The goal isn’t one giant Canadian platform, but a shared infrastructure where many platforms can compete and thrive.
That model points to a governance question the sector hasn’t yet seriously taken up: who convenes the shared infrastructure, and on whose terms? The answer matters because the competitive pressure is coming from outside the country, not from within it. That is the question the next phase of reform needs to start with.
The clearest path forward is already visible at the edges. It’s time to treat those edge successes as signals, not exceptions, and redesign the system so what works at the margins can scale to the centre.
In Brief
The future of Canadian media is already being built at the edges – by specialized, export-focused companies that own their IP, connect directly with audiences, and treat distribution as a strategic asset. They built it not because the system encouraged it, but because survival outside the protected centre demanded it. The question is whether Canada treats that edge success as an anomaly, or as the signal the system should follow.
Brad Danks is CEO of OUTtv Media Global and an Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of Victoria. He is a frequent writer and speaker on the evolving media landscape. He represents OUTtv’s interests as a member of industry groups, including Beyond Mainstream – a global alliance of independent streaming companies advancing innovation and competition in digital media, and Streaming for Australia. Brad also sits on Numeris’ Board and is a faculty advisor at the Center for Digital Media in Vancouver.
HIGH QUALITY JOURNALISM REQUIRES AN INVESTMENT.
Cartt.ca publishes breaking news, in-depth feature stories, analysis, and opinion geared specifically for those working in the cable, radio, television, and telecom industries in Canada.
Breaking news, top-notch analysis and commentary is posted as it happens while twice-weekly newsletters compile those stories and deliver them directly to more than 4,000 industry subscribers. Cartt.ca offers credible journalism for the industry professional.
